Adventures in places, brands and place brands

jeremy@jeremyhildreth.com

Anholt: nation branding’s “the most interesting subject in the known universe”

Chile's image programme dives deep

Chile's image programme dives deep

Simon Anholt, the man with whom I wrote Brand America, emailed me today to say his new website is finally live. Which reminded me I wanted to post an excerpt from a talk he gave in Chile in March (he spoke, as usual, without notes, slides or musical accompaniment, for 60 compelling minutes).

He’s been working with Chile — one of those countries which certainly deserves a better and more vivid reputation than it has — to establish ‘a machinery’ (his words) of brand development and maintenance for the country. He believes that a country really must learn to take charge of its own image, even if consultants help the process. Advertising is typically an extravagent waste of public funds. His research backs this up:

Since 2005, I’ve been asking about 39,000 of my closest friends around the world what they think about 50 countries. And in the years I’ve been doing this study I have never seen any, any evidence whatsoever that the millions of dollars that countries spend on changing their image has had any effect at all.

In fact, possibly the contrary. I’ll give you one very good example. One of the few countries whose image has been improving quite steadily over the last three or four years is Brazil. Brazil has done little or no nation branding. They talk about it, but they don’t do it.

By contrast, one of the countries that has spent the most money on nation branding is Malaysia.  “Malaysia truly Asia” is a non-rhyming slogan that many of us are familiar with. They have spent hundreds of millions on managing their image.  And the image of Malaysia has declined slowly but steadily over the last four years.  So you could even argue that there is an inverse correlation between the amount of nation branding that countries do and the health of their reputation.

I won’t claim that. What I do claim is that the two things have nothing to do with each other.

He was a tough act to follow, but I got the lucky post-lunch spot after Simon’s late morning session, and did my damndest with it.

Leave a Reply

Where are you from?

And for a brand, or for a place itself, what does that mean emotionally and commercially?

In the contexts of image, identity and marketing, dealing with these questions superbly is crucial in today's globalized, short-attention-span world.

Jeremy Hildreth, an adviser to companies, tourist departments and investment bureaus, aims to inspire and enlighten those who deal professionally with provenance and place of origin.

This website, then, is about brands *from* places (MADE IN X) and the brands *of* places (COME TO Y, OPEN AN OFFICE IN Z) -- and helping you understand and make the most of all that.

Read more about the author »

Speaking on YouTube

Speaking on YouTube

A string of funny and insightful anecdotes about the way countries regard (or loathe) themselves, and how that affects outsiders' perceptions (clip: 2 mins).

In the news: Branding the hard way

In the news: Branding the hard way

Jeremy tells CNN/Fortune that Estonia getting the Euro is an 'unfakeable' positive signal for the country. "It's something that they've earned from scratch."

In the news: Jeremy’s new book is out

In the news: My new book is out

Brand America (2nd edition): the making, unmaking and remaking of the greatest national image of all time. Co-authored with Simon Anholt.

In the news: Swedish Lapland

In the news: Swedish Lapland

Coverage of a press conference in a Sami-esque tipi. Text in Swedish, radio interview in English/Swedish.

RSS